Rakesh Sinha said on caa and nrc, India discharged its historical responsibility – India discharged historical responsibility

On the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), Rajya Sabha MP and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh ideologue Rakesh Sinha says that confusion is being spread on the historic move of the Indian government and trying to propagate communal polarization. Has been The opposition has no core issues and is opposing the government on the basis of perception. They have no moral and constitutional basis of protest. Sinha said that the Citizenship Amendment Act is constitutional and compatible with India's civilization. Even before independence, Jews and Zoroastrians were given place here because they were being tortured on the basis of religious discrimination.

In a special conversation with Jansatta, Sinha said that to understand the latest law, we also have to understand the situation made in 1950. The Nehru-Liaquat agreement was signed in 1950 after independence and partition. Hindus who migrated to East Pakistan after partition feared that their lives there would be vicious. Barring one or two people, no one had talked of swapping the population at that time. At that time, the Congress leaders gave a verbal message to the Hindus that there would be protection of their lives and religion, it would be our responsibility to stop any kind of atrocities on them.

After this, there was agreement between Nehru and Liaquat that the safety of the minorities of their respective countries would be concerned with those countries which was theoretically correct. The agreement was signed on 8 February and Shyama Prasad Mukherjee resigned in protest against it on 19 February. After this, the population of Hindus declined rapidly in Pakistan and Bangladesh. After partition, the Modi government did the work to correct this situation. India is a secular country and it gives people the right to faith. Muslims were not included in this because their right to faith is protected. The areas of their struggle are for any other reason, not on the basis of religion. Rakesh Sinha said that the rights of Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh are in danger. Giving them their rights can be how to take away someone's right in India.

Did the government anticipate that there would be a nationwide antagonism against

Advertisement
the Citizenship Amendment Act and the leaders of allied parties like Nitish Kumar would also be against it? In response to this question, Rakesh Sinha said that the background of this law was ready since 1950. A large number of Hindu refugees were living in Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. In the Congress time too, refugees were given other facilities except the right franchise in a very slow way. It was also advocated in 2003 by Manmohan Singh and in 2012 by the CPI (M). So this law has been made only by looking at the complete consensus.

Sinha, questioning the manner of protest, said that it is the same prize-withdrawal gang which opposes Narendra Modi merely on the basis of perception. No offers of negotiation, no memorandum and directly triggered violent protests. The violence was carried out without any provocation. There is a coalition of a class of intellectuals in India and among intellectuals of the West, who dislike their dislike for propaganda. Such violent movements tarnish the image of the Nation 4. It has become a protest challenging the state, not against the government.
Did the government not know the ground situation of Assam? On this question, Rakesh Sinha said that what happened in Assam regarding NRC was subordinated to and on the instructions of the Assam Accord and the Supreme Court. It is the intention of the government to have NRC all over the country. But nothing has been discussed about its nation-wide nature, law and procedure.

Opposition to the nation-wide NRC is to shoot arrows in the sky. Many international institutions, including universities around the world, have questioned the citizenship amendment law. Will this cause major damage to India's international image? In response, Rakesh Sinha said that India has created a new image in the whole world after 2014. There is no movement like non-alignment, but Narendra Modi has emerged as a global leader. They talk momentarily. It is natural to have a mild reaction, it is of no great importance. India has historically harbored all those who are religiously oppressed. India has played an important role in global moral responsibility, taking steps to give citizenship to stateless and deprived people.

Hindi News Join us Facebook page and Twitter handle with LinkedIn [JoinandDownloadon Hindi News App

          

<! –

->



The post Rakesh Sinha said on caa and nrc, India discharged its historical responsibility – India discharged historical responsibility appeared first on Khabar Bollywood.



source http://www.khabarsbollywood.com/rakesh-sinha-said-on-caa-and-nrc-india-discharged-its-historical-responsibility-india-discharged-historical-responsibility/
إرسال تعليق (0)
أحدث أقدم